Good governance is an idea which has many advocates and opponents. From last years of 1980s this term became common. However, there is not any clear definition or description for good governance or even governance. Though unanimity on its characteristics is invisible, it is possible to consider eight characteristics for god governance: participation, accountability, transparency, rule of law, responsiveness, consensus-ward, to be fair and representing, and effectiveness and efficiency. Realization of these characteristics will minimize corruption. However, there are some problems for the realization of good governance and its appropriate pattern.

After offering an overview of some of the main themes of Popper’s political thought, the paper argues that his account faces two problems relating to institutions. The first is that while Popper stresses the ‘rational unity of mankind’, and the potential for any of us to furnish criticisms of public policy, it is not clear what institutional means currently exist for this to enable this to take place. Second, Popper has stressed the conjectural character of even our best theories. However, at any point, some theories will have fared better in the face of criticism than others, and they may give us important information about constraints on our actions. At the same time, as ordinary citizens we may not be in a good position to understand the theories in question, let alone appraise the state of the specialised discussion of them. There is, it is suggested, a case for thinking of ways to institutionally entrench such fallible theories, especially in the current setting in which social media play an important role

Quality assurance is defined as part of qualitymanagement focused on providing confidence that qualityrequirements will be fulfilled, other parts being qualityplanning, quality control and quality improvement. Theseterms are of importance to all activities of economicinterest with regard to products, services and proceduresincluding conformity assessment activities. Quality assurance is important not only for a particular activity but alsofor other activities linked with it; this may include supplies, manufacture, marketing, conformity assessment, accreditation, competent authorities and customers. This article isfocused on some of the training needs referring to specificaspects of interest to the main parties involved in each case. Based on the experience gained within the CyprusAccreditation Body, the article gives examples illustratingthe importance of training and awareness for the understanding of various aspects of quality assurance by allparties, to the extent necessary so that they know what theyare looking for, how compliance with requirements isdocumented and how an assessment of compliance isconfirmed. The article gives emphasis to laboratories andinterrelated activities with reference to the requirements ofaccreditation and certification standards applicable in each Case. Common understanding of basic aspects of qualityassurance and their use as tools in a common technical language require training and awareness at all levels so thatquality assurance helps the expectations and the overallquality and economic goals of the society to be realized. This is how a quality culture is created and enhanced.

Our analysis of Popper’s philosophy of science focuses on his concepts of tradition and situational analysis. These concepts represent innovative Popperian contributions to a historical and hermeneutical turn in philosophy of science that most of his critics, especially Kuhn, fail to recognize. According to his historical view, Popper conceives sciences as a complex of traditions in continuous transformation and progress by means of rational discussion of theories. In order to grasp the rational progress of scientific traditions, Popper proposes an original method that he calls “situational analysis”. This hermeneutical method seeks to understand the concepts, hypotheses, actions, practices, controversies and products that scientists made to solve problems in their specific historical contexts to improve the truth content of theories. In addition to his historical and hermeneutical turn, Popper also inquired about the social and political conditions for the progress of scientific traditions by means of intersubjective criticism of theories and conjectures. According to him, the rational discussion of ideas requires, as necessary conditions, plurality of ideas, intellectual humility, and freedom of thought and communication that can only exist in an open and democratic society. With these considerations, we may say that in addition to a historical and hermeneutical turn, Popper also contributed to a social and political turn in the philosophy of science

In translation criticism the critic deals with two texts: the original and the target. In this process, the target text is contrasted with the original, and then the good and weak points are dealt with on the basis of translation principles and theories. Some grammatical and linguistic weak points can be found and improved even without contrast, but the keystone for investigating the accuracy of the meaning in the target text is the original.In literary criticism a speech is evaluated according to its literary aspects, and a critic may criticize a literary text from different points of view, such as literary style, and ethical, social, economical, political, historical, cultural and religious aspects, as well as in accordance with the level of knowledge and thought of the speaker.In the present article the emphasis is put on this point that personal view of the critic will always have its effect on both translation and literary criticism. Therefore, it should be said that different persons may criticize a literary text or translation differently due to their different personal notions.

The new theory of criticism calling into question the traditional mode that had governed the literary analyses during several centuries, tries to challenge the truth that this one pretends In explore. To encourage In reconsidering the meaning of Truth and introducing it as a subject out of the Traditional Criticism function or any other one, is the philosophy that confronts the New Criticism with its old and strong rival. Accepting the principle of "impossibility of reaching the Truth", the new critic presents his literary interpretation from his own point of view. So he looks for coherence in text that can justify his subjective interpretation from one of the linguistical, psychoanalytical, anthropological. theories. In this article, studying the principles of Traditional and New Criticism, we would compare their functions in the literature. Referring In the famous critics' theories, we will verify the New Criticism opinions and the horizon that this theory opens to the literature by commanding a free reading.